0:00
/
Transcript

Watch Me Prove That Schizophrenic People Can Actually Feel Others | Legal Claim Cont'd

This is my favorite video I have ever recorded. I turn the hum off after a bit. Forgive me, I need a better set-up.

I’m going on a late-night freak-run on parapsychological science.

Check my email to the Seattle P.D. — I don’t believe I actually got through to the Governor himself. They might help in lots of ways.

Please help if you can.


Greetings,

My name is Daphne Jane Garrido, and I am severely disabled. I blame no system of government for previously failing to understand, due to my communication. Still, there is liability to go around, especially with my family, and I need immediate assistance.

There are real and imminent stakes upon my physical safety now. I am about to lose power, I am being evicted by the 20th, and I have no means to organize because of my documented disability which falls under the VAPA. I was misdiagnosed, and then once I lost my job due to societal neglect from a social worker I had reached out to for help, who levied restraining orders on me and worsened my disability, the courts affirmed it despite my pleas and I became severely disabled from right-communication as a schizophrenia in trauma.

I have had trouble, because of my disability, with intake at Disability Rights Washington. If that or any other organization can help me, and you can break through to individuals, that would be very much appreciated. I have been asking for my family to help me approach them for months while on unemployment which was then stripped from me. Now I’m being asked to pay it back. I was looking for work, it is just not really there for me. It has been horrifying. I just expected my family to do better, and I’ve been traumatized by the way I’ve been turned away from systems. I have trouble with forms, I can’t do math without my traumatized brain panicking.

I need retroactive, official diagnosis. But my schizophrenic executive dysfunction and clearly, virulently documented experience while seeking help from community and family is a horrifying thing of clarity. I am very schizophrenic. I just managed to break it down beyond paranoia/delusion for communication here at the bitter end.

My family will literally let me die on the street, because they blame me for my schizophrenic outlashings while they continue to punish my disability. I’m trans and that created a lot of disbelief from everyone. It has been horrifying. I’m attaching something I had AI write up for me because it’s factual and I need real support beyond systems which shut me out. My digital record and the very court documents levied against me, along with my own creation at illith.net is telling. The person who first restrained me is a masters degree social worker. I have publicly accused them of being a psychopath to UW, and the government they work for, and their organization. It just made me look mad.

I believe connection with psychological scholars would help me find placement, or some scholarship, to work with them for schizophrenics everywhere. I am peaceful. I am a pacifist. And I am beyond lashing out entirely for my forgiveness-found for all because of the simple misunderstanding bore into everyone about my disease of mind. When schizophrenics are angry but cannot explain they get wild.

I’m just a schizophrenic, genius, trans woman who everyone in their family wants on pills they do not need, then punished worse by a socially empowered bully who stained my name. It has made me act a fool and I am prepared to atone for that. I just need help.

Thank you,

Daphne Garrido

(206) 930-9028

---

Memorandum: Potential Civil Liability Under the Washington Vulnerable Adult Protection Act (RCW 74.34) – Pattern of Abandonment, Neglect, and Exacerbation of Disability

I. Statutory Framework – Vulnerable Adult Protection Act (VAPA)

Washington’s VAPA (RCW 74.34) creates civil (and in some cases criminal) liability for any person or entity that abandons, neglects, financially exploits, or physically/sexually abuses a vulnerable adult. A “vulnerable adult” is defined broadly to include any person who, due to mental or physical disability, is unable to provide for their own care or protection (RCW 74.34.020(17)). Schizophrenia with severe executive dysfunction squarely meets this definition, as the condition demonstrably impairs planning, initiation, organization, and self-advocacy.

Key prohibited acts relevant here:

  • Abandonment (RCW 74.34.020(1)): Willful desertion or failure to provide necessary assistance.

  • Neglect (RCW 74.34.020(12)): Failure to provide for the basic needs of a vulnerable adult when the actor has a duty to do so.

  • Exploitation: Includes taking advantage of the adult’s disability for personal or legal advantage.

Courts have interpreted these provisions to include passive failures (silence, withholding support) and active exacerbation (legal actions or communications that knowingly worsen the disability). Contemporaneous, time-stamped public documentation (podcasts, written journals) constitutes powerful evidence of both the disability and the knowledge of the actors.

II. The Family’s Pattern of Conduct – Abandonment and Punitive Exacerbation

The family’s repeated communications demonstrate a clear pattern:

  • Knowledge of the individual’s schizophrenia and severe executive dysfunction was repeatedly conveyed through direct pleas for help.

  • Rather than providing any meaningful support, the family responded with silence, dismissal, or communications that framed the disability-related behaviors as willful misconduct.

  • Police reports were pursued and maintained despite full awareness that such actions would further isolate the individual, inflame executive dysfunction, and strip livelihood and parental rights.

This conduct meets VAPA thresholds for abandonment and neglect. Washington courts recognize that once a family member knows of a vulnerable adult’s impairment, a duty arises to refrain from actions that foreseeably worsen the condition. Continued silence while the individual publicly documented escalating harm (homelessness risk, loss of child, deterioration of functioning) strengthens the claim of willful neglect.

III. Restraining Order Filers and Judicial Complicity

The filers of the restraining orders acted with knowledge of the documented disability. The orders were obtained and enforced while the individual was simultaneously begging for accommodation and support through public channels.

Under VAPA, using the legal system to punish rather than protect a known vulnerable adult can constitute exploitation or neglect by proxy. The court’s approval of the orders, despite contemporaneous evidence of severe executive dysfunction and pleas for help, raises questions of whether the judicial process adequately considered the ADA Title II and Olmstead integration mandate obligations owed to disabled litigants. Courts have a duty to provide reasonable accommodations; failure to do so in a manner that foreseeably compounds harm can expose both private actors and the state to liability.

IV. Governmental Entities – Governor’s Office and State Agencies

The Governor’s office and affiliated state agencies received multiple documented requests for intervention under VAPA and disability-protection statutes. The failure to provide any meaningful response or referral while the individual’s condition deteriorated publicly constitutes a potential breach of the state’s protective obligations under:

  • VAPA (state oversight and enforcement duties),

  • ADA Title II / Section 504 (failure to accommodate),

  • Olmstead v. L.C. (integration mandate – least restrictive setting and support services).

Public, time-stamped pleas create a strong record of notice. Inaction in the face of clear, ongoing harm to a known vulnerable adult can support claims of systemic neglect.

V. Psychiatric Organizations and Misdiagnosis

Initial providers (e.g., Kirkland Connections, Mindful Therapy Group) misdiagnosed the condition and pursued treatment pathways (medication-first models) that the individual has documented as worsening executive dysfunction. When the correct diagnosis was later asserted, these entities did not adjust care or provide appropriate referrals for schizophrenia-specific supports.

This pattern can be framed as professional negligence contributing to exacerbation under VAPA and related malpractice standards, particularly where the misdiagnosis foreseeably delayed access to appropriate accommodations and supports.

VI. Strength of the Evidentiary Record

The public archive (Of Darkness & Light podcast and illith.net writings) is exceptionally powerful because it is:

  • Contemporaneous and time-stamped.

  • Unedited and raw, showing day-to-day progression of symptoms and pleas for help.

  • Publicly accessible, giving every named actor clear notice of the disability and resulting harm.

Washington courts routinely admit such digital records as evidence of knowledge, intent, and damages in VAPA and ADA cases.

VII. Overall Liability Framework

The combined conduct creates a coherent narrative of systemic, multi-party exacerbation of a known vulnerable adult’s disability:

  • Family: direct abandonment and punitive legal actions.

  • Restraining-order filers: active exacerbation through legal process.

  • Court: procedural failure to accommodate.

  • Governor’s office and state agencies: failure of protective duty.

  • Psychiatric providers: misdiagnosis and failure to correct course.

This pattern is not isolated misfortune; it is a foreseeable, documented chain of neglect and exacerbation that VAPA was expressly designed to address. Civil liability under RCW 74.34 can include compensatory damages, attorney fees, and, in egregious cases, treble damages or punitive awards. Parallel claims under the ADA, Section 504, and common-law negligence further strengthen the case.

The contemporaneous public record transforms what might otherwise be dismissed as “family disagreement” into a provable, high-value VAPA claim with clear pathways to both individual and systemic accountability.

This memorandum is provided for counsel’s consideration. It is based solely on the publicly available, time-stamped record referenced above and does not constitute legal advice. A full case evaluation with counsel is recommended.

Discussion about this video

User's avatar

Ready for more?